arXiv (All)
open access
Compression Is Not Evaluation-Neutral: Fixed RAG Compression Can Distort Reader Comparisons
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) evaluations often compare readers after a compressor has changed their evidence. This mixes two questions: which complete pipeline works best, and how much of a reader upgrade survives compression. We show that fixed compression can raise average pipeline accurac
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparing Chunking and Embedding Strategies for Turkish RAG Systems#780747
- Comparing Chunking and Embedding Strategies for Turkish RAG Systems#779372
- Write-Read Decoupling in Modern Large-Scale Search Engines: Architectures, Techniques, and Emerging Approaches#155420
- Fine-Tuning a KV Cache Concatenation-Aware Model or Recomputing KV Caches? Why Not Both?#996590
- Iterative Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering#1109048
Record · ID 1198954
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive