arXiv (All)
open access
Do Language Models Need a Trainable Input Embedding Table? Fixed Minimal Token Codes at 1.7B-Class Scale
A trainable input embedding table assigns each vocabulary item an independently adjustable vector. We investigate whether this token-specific parameterization is required for substantial language-modeling capability, or whether a shared Transformer can learn from fixed token identities. We compare t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Robust Text Watermarking for Large Language Models via Dual Semantic Embeddings#927363
- Improving Parameter Utilization by Sharing Neural Experts Across Layers in Transformers#1036882
- Synthetic Semantic Supervision for Contrastive Code Representation Learning in Small Transformers: An Empirical Study#926594
- (Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models#414122
- DataFlex: A Unified Framework for Data-Centric Dynamic Training of Large Language Models#406538
Record · ID 1199276
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive