arXiv (All)
open access
Shared Geometry Is Not Shared Physics: A Layerwise Test of the Platonic Representation Hypothesis in Astronomy
In this paper we investigate whether geometrically aligned astronomical representations are also scientifically interchangeable. We analyze every layer's representation from 36 pretrained models using cross-matched optical images, infrared images, and spectra. All 139 analyzed model-survey compariso
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Displacement Geometry Captures Platonic Shared Reality Across Models and Modalities#1050392
- DINOspec: Efficient Multimodal Alignment of Vision and Spectral Foundation Models for Astronomy#799698
- Shared Geometry As A Rosetta Stone: Cross-Modal Alignment Without Paired Data#1233450
- SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal Transport#1050824
- Data geometry preserves prediction but reshapes explanation#1218112
Record · ID 1199404
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive