arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Pairwise Equivalence Judgments: Self-Critique Effects and Diversity Measurement in Multi-Agent Hypothesis Generation
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific discovery and hypothesis generation. Both the effect of refinement and the diversity of the delivered set are hard to interpret before experimental ground truth exists, and both are typically reported by
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers#822314
- Language Models Are "Insecure" Reporters#1130981
- Population Physics, Population Problems: Safety and Emergence in LLM Societies#1118944
- Coherence-Aware Distributional Evaluation of Open-Ended Text Generation#1119313
- Epistemological Sequencing as an Architectural Principle: Structural Output Properties of Multi-Regime Inference over Large Language Models#709626
Record · ID 1199407
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive