arXiv (All)
open access
AI-Enabled Quality Assurance for Multiple-Choice Assessment Items
Generating multiple-choice questions is increasingly scalable, but establishing their assessment quality remains difficult. We present a focused narrative review of automated item-writing flaw detection, revision, psychometric screening, and NLP benchmark auditing. Database searches, citation retrie
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#799579
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#798156
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#1069958
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
Record · ID 1199541
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive