arXiv (All)
open access
Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is the canonical framework for large language model alignment. However, rising popularity in offline alignment algorithms challenge the need for on-policy sampling in RLHF. Within the context of reward over-optimization, we start with an opening set
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- QwenGyre: An Elastic Reinforcement Learning Framework for Training xLong-Horizon Agents#1118921
- QwenGyre: An Elastic Reinforcement Learning Framework for Training xLong-Horizon Agents#1108723
- GPAgentBench-2K: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in Complex Clinical Action Space#822019
- DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibration#1105773
- From Constitutions to Control: Interpretable Rewards for Aligning Language Models#1117798
Record · ID 1199629
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive