arXiv (All)
open access
Adaptive Information Control for Search-Augmented LLM Reasoning
Search-augmented reasoning agents interleave multi-step reasoning with external retrieval, but uncontrolled retrieval can introduce redundant evidence, saturate the context, and destabilize reinforcement learning (RL). Existing outcome-based RL methods provide only sparse terminal rewards, offering
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Apriel-Reasoner: RL Post-Training for General-Purpose and Efficient Reasoning#984141
- SkillForge: Co-Evolving Skills and Agents via Dynamic Skill Lifecycles#1234199
- Do LLMs Learn from Rewards in Context? : Rethinking the role of reward in In-Context Reinforcement Learning#1248079
- Reinforcement Learning Improves Traversal of Parametric Knowledge in LLMs#972399
- When Does External Guidance Help LLM Reasoning? A Bias-Variance Theory of Guidance-Augmented GRPO#1215943
Record · ID 1199742
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive