arXiv (All)
open access
LocusRL: Diagnosing LLM Reward and Policy Interventions in Competitive Games
Large language models can intervene in reinforcement learning through both reward design and action selection, yet aggregate performance offers an incomplete account of what these interventions actually do. Similar returns can conceal different learning mechanisms, while plausible rewards can induce
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GameSmith: Scaling Zero-Sum Self-Play with Synthesised Games#1324596
- Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs#324919
- PREFER: From Player Experience to Personalized Game Refinement#1345036
- Kratzerian 'want', decision theory, and upward entailment#83369
- TuneTwins: An Intrinsically Motivating Game Paradigm for Scalable Music Cognition Research#305988
Record · ID 1200092
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive