arXiv (All)
open access
Decide, Ask, or Defer: Clinical LLMs under Incomplete Evidence
Clinical LLMs must decide not only what diagnosis to produce, but also whether the available evidence is sufficient for autonomous decision making. Binary DECIDE/ABSTAIN formulations merge distinct non decision states and do not explicitly evaluate information acquisition. We introduce a DECIDE/ASK/
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Counterfactual Analysis of Executable Clinical Decision Logic#657299
- From Sampled Evidence to Radiology Reports: Objectives, Constraints, and Realization#1342194
- Evaluating a Decision Aid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Intermediate-Risk Melanoma#853917
- AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential#335854
- Trustworthy personalized treatment selection: causal effect-trees and calibration in perioperative medicine#10214
Record · ID 1200193
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive