arXiv (All)
open access
Organising Trajectory Evidence for Language-Model Agent Assurance: Fragments, Methods, and the Residual
Methods for assessing language-model agents include rule checkers over logs, analyses of skill coverage and composition, support checkers, prefix monitors, execution gates, and rare-event estimators. Each observes a different part of a run and makes a claim of a different strength, and no common acc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models#924392
- GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models#920161
- AnyAct: Universal Action for Self-Evolving Agents#1132226
- COUNTERMEM: World-Model Verified Counter-Factual Memory for Language Agents#1115830
- Propensity to trust in Large Language Models.#159627
Record · ID 1200361
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive