arXiv (All)
open access
What Will Post-Training Fix? Per-Problem Gains Are Shared Across Independent RL Runs, and Existing Checkpoints Predict Them Better Than A Priori Signals
Data selection, curricula and the evaluation of post-training recipes all assume that we can tell, before training, which problems a model will improve on. We test this assumption directly. For two base models, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, we evaluate eighteen post-training r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Statistical Benefits of Fine-Tuning from Pretrained Initialization in Diagonal Linear Networks#1129014
- When Does Disaggregation Pay? Simulating Prefill--Decode--Attention--FFN Specialization for Agentic LLM Inference#429326
- Router Drift Control: Mitigating Off-Policy Degradation in Mixture-of-Experts Reinforcement Learning#1357337
- BitSparse: Compact Activation Storage for ReLU Feed-Forward Networks#1357911
- BitSparse: Compact Activation Storage for ReLU Feed-Forward Networks#1348847
Record · ID 1200629
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive