arXiv (All)
open access
Who Checks the Citations? Benchmarking Legal Hallucination Detection
Attorneys, judges, and pro se filers increasingly use AI to draft legal documents, yet these tools frequently fabricate citations. Despite predictions that newer models would hallucinate less or that court sanctions would deter negligent filers, we found over 1,000 filings containing fabricated cita
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Demonstrating Law Library Value Through Mission-Centered Assessment#990433
- Historical Meme Profiles and Legal Language Models for Appellate Vote Alignment Prediction#692160
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- <b>Artificial Intelligence or Artificially Inconsistent? The Flaws of AI in Forensic and Legal Fields </b>#996445
- AI Ethics in Legal Decision-Making Bias, Transparency, And Accountability#99666
Record · ID 1200976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive