arXiv (All)
open access
First They Came for the Others: A Theory of Divide-and-Conquer
Divide-and-conquer tactics often succeed not through mechanical coordination failures, but through inferential friction regarding an aggressor's underlying intent. When an attacker strikes a first target, bystanders must infer whether the assault represents a localized grievance or a systemic campai
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proportionality in Self-Defense#770854
- An analysis of "shoot-and-scoot" tactics#674600
- What Follows from Defensive Non-Liaibility?#747281
- The Case for Liberalizing the Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense#1019885
- Shalom on the Impermissibility of Self-Defense against the Tactical Bomber#770929
Record · ID 1201006
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive