arXiv (All)
open access
Validity, Reliability, and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Regulation
AI systems increasingly produce claims about people that shape access to employment, healthcare, and other consequential services. Yet lawful data processing and predictive accuracy do not establish that these claims justify the treatment that follows. We argue that regulation must therefore examine
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Challenges and conceptualizing ai-powered privacy risk assessments: Legal models for U.S. data protection compliance#1177519
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Privacy: Navigating Cyber Laws in theAge of Machine Learning#1177329
- Three Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Antitrust Policy and Law#1176674
- THREE CHALLENGES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ANTITRUST POLICY AND LAW#1176607
- Data Protection in AI Services#400333
Record · ID 1201029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive