arXiv (All)
open access
Verification Trap: Understanding Test-Time Selection Failures under False Premises in Code Generation
Test-time compute has become a central way to improve code generation: systems sample multiple candidate programs and use verifier-visible evidence to select the final output. This paradigm implicitly assumes that the verifier provides a corrective signal independent from the generator. We challenge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AutoINV: Automated Invariant Generation Framework for Formal Verification on High-Level Synthesis Designs#134622
- Identity or Prompt Noise? A Calibrated Invariance Audit of LLM Code Generation#1037194
- Identity or Prompt Noise? A Calibrated Invariance Audit of LLM Code Generation#1028784
- Generating Proof-of-Vulnerability Tests to Help Enhance the Security of Complex Software#155358
- Beyond Static Guarantees: Measuring the Static-Pass Dynamic-Fail Gap in Security-Sensitive and LLM-Generated Python Code#997752
Record · ID 1201183
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive