arXiv (All)
open access
Same Predictions, Different Harms: Causal Auditing of Patient World Models
Patient world models used for clinical trial simulation can agree on transition kernels and arm-specific risks, yet disagree on the fraction of patients harmed by switching treatment---the counterfactual quantity that matters for intervention-aware reasoning. We audit this reliability gap in a two-s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Predictive Modeling Inform the Selection of Time Zero for Target Trial Emulations? An Empirical Study of Atorvastatin Initiation in Medicare Beneficiaries#337071
- RegDivergence-101: An LLM Benchmark for Cross-Jurisdiction Regulatory Contradiction Detection in Life Sciences#792858
- RegDivergence-101: An LLM Benchmark for Cross-Jurisdiction Regulatory Contradiction Detection in Life Sciences#788854
- How Reliable Are System-One Decisions in Medicine? A Comparative Study of Jev, Jev-like Models, and LLMs#1344031
- Splitting the Difference: Interpretable Causal Forests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity and Bias#1123379
Record · ID 1201211
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive