arXiv (All)
open access
When Verifiable Counts Depend on Wording: Auditing Wording Robustness in Instruction Following
Verifiable instruction-following benchmarks often express each constraint through one fixed template. We test whether scores remain stable when the operational requirement is unchanged but its wording varies. We introduce WISE, a matched evaluation suite and reporting protocol instantiated on exact
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- No Red Lines: The Impossibility of Formal Safety Guarantees in Large Language Models V2.0#80379
- Specification-Based Testing of Large Language Models#1325339
- VALIDATING REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS STATED IN KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION LANGUAGE TEMPLAR#933483
- Stepwise refinement of formal specifications based on logical formulae : from CO-OPN/2 specifications to Java programs#445109
- LeanCSP: A Framework for Certifying Constraint Reformulation and Solving in Lean#414146
Record · ID 1201291
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive