arXiv (All)
open access
When Low Prediction Error Misleads Planning: Diagnosing Representation, Dynamics, and Decision Failures in Latent World Models
The component that dominates a latent world model's prediction error need not be the one whose repair most improves action selection. We show this by comparing action sequences from identical physical starts and separating endpoint error into a candidate-pool center and action-relative responses. Ac
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ATLAS: Aligned Transport of Latent Structure for Reliable World Model Planning#1131175
- Order-Consistent Latent Geometry for Reliable Short-Horizon Planning in World Models#1344071
- Action-Consequence Alignment for Reliable Planning and Self-Improving in Latent World Models#1200190
- ForeDrive: Foresight-Guided End-to-End Autonomous Driving with a Planning-Relevant Latent World Model#1063004
- ACID: Action Consistency via Inverse Dynamics for Planning with World Models#1248500
Record · ID 1201563
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive