arXiv (All)
open access
UndoBench: Separating Task Competence from Recovery Capability in Tool-Using AI Agents
Tool-using AI agents are increasingly deployed across enterprise software systems, yet widely used benchmarks primarily evaluate nominal task completion, conflating baseline planning competence with operational fault recovery. We introduce UndoBench, a benchmark spanning 36 base workflows and 36 fau
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- UndoBench: Separating Task Competence from Recovery Capability in Tool-Using AI Agents#1210380
- Using Process Mining to Generate AI Agents from Software Engineering Process Records#1199899
- Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store#175107
- ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance#819420
- ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance#809427
Record · ID 1201635
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive