arXiv (All)
open access
Measurement-First Auditing of Agentic Leaderboards: Contamination Susceptibility, Matched-Control Re-evaluation, and Scorer Validation
Agentic leaderboards increasingly evaluate systems on public benchmarks whose task statements and solution-bearing artifacts can remain accessible. We propose a measurement-first audit framework that distinguishes contamination claims according to the evidence required to support them. It separates
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Behavioral Integrity Verification for AI Agent Skills#178803
- Attesting Outputs and Delegation Ancestry in Multi-Agent AI Systems#622440
- Auditing VLM Benchmarks from Existing Evaluation Runs#1297900
- Reverse Turing Tests for Human-Machine Task Suitability Assessments Should be Profile-Driven#204160
- Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation#999836
Record · ID 1202249
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive