arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Transport Cost: Routing Differences between Flow Matching and Optimal Transport
In generative models, Optimal Transport (OT) is used to improve Flow Matching (FM) by reducing noise-data coupling cost. However, different noise-to-output assignments can yield nearly equal costs, raising a key question. Is cost alone sufficient to guide coupling design? We address this question by
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ROMS-IMLE: A Minimalist Approach to Competitive Single-Step Generative Modelling#926127
- Theoretical guarantees in KL for Diffusion Flow Matching#1203887
- Order-Optimal Sample Complexity of Rectified Flows#1232651
- Euclidean Distance-Based Flow Matching#1344036
- VTV-FM: Flow Matching through Variational Terminal-Velocity Closure#1155720
Record · ID 1202340
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive