arXiv (All)
open access
Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression
The use of run-off triangles (ROTs) is a common industry practice in estimating the loss given default (LGD) risk parameter when predicting credit losses in banking. We benchmark this industry practice using credit card data against a more sophisticated (though classical) regression-based approach,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cyber Risk Orchestration for Systemic Financial Stability: An Autonomous Financial Impact Forecasting#732063
- Consumer Credit Card Market Report of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025#512382
- Online Distributional Regression#163046
- The Persistence and Asymmetric Volatility in the Nigerian Stocks Bull and Bear Markets#401144
- Information Borrowing for Cox Regression with an Auxiliary Outcome#1117781
Record · ID 1202345
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive