arXiv (All)
open access
TrustMI: Causally controlling how assistants trust their users
Large Language Model (LLM) assistants routinely decide whether they can trust users and third parties whose competence, intentions, and integrity they cannot verify. This uncertainty matters for safety, as trusting the wrong party can lead an agent to comply with harmful requests or act on malicious
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Agentic Trust Crosses Organizational Boundaries: Structural Externalization and a Reference Model for Trust Evidence#1048357
- Loud Failures, Quiet Failures: Fault Detection and Recovery in Tool-Using Language Model Agents#1234429
- Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models#665785
- Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models#664285
- Notes on the Synthesis of Trust#91656
Record · ID 1202483
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive