arXiv (All)
open access
Where Did the Repair First Go Wrong? Localizing the Origins of Silent Failures in Agentic Vulnerability Repair
Localizing where an LLM-based agent first fails to uphold security during a repair can show which stage of its workflow needs an additional safeguard. This is difficult for silent failures, which are patches that pass syntactic and functional checks but still contain a security vulnerability. Becaus
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Where Did the Repair First Go Wrong? Localizing the Origins of Silent Failures in Agentic Vulnerability Repair#1194323
- Executable Prefix Values for Locating Agent Failures#1342845
- From Failed Trajectories to Reliable LLM Agents: Diagnosing and Repairing Harness Flaws#259533
- Real-Time Detection and Repair of LLM Agent Failures#423971
- Calibrating Criterion Revision in LLM Agents: Failure Modes and a Trace-Anchored Protocol#659285
Record · ID 1202582
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive