arXiv (All)
open access
Breaking Bureaucracy: Evaluating open-source LLMs for legal document review
In this paper, we evaluate open-source generative LLMs on legal Natural Language Inference (NLI). Legal inspectorial processes take place in specific domains and often deal with confidential data. This creates a need for working with local models that do not require labeled training data. We evaluat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Explainable Natural Language Inference in the Legal Domain via Text Generation#1178643
- Enhancing legal question answering with data generation and knowledge distillation from large language models#679304
- DALE: Generative Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Legal NLP#679254
- The benefits and dangers of using machine learning to support making legal predictions#270964
- Time To Regulate Use of Generative AI In Professional Legal Practice - A Study of Recent Errors While Using Generative AI and Its Ethical Implications#293763
Record · ID 1202764
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive