Duke Law Scholarship Repository
metadata only
The Ambitions of History and Tradition in and Beyond the Second Amendment
This Article examines the ambitions of history-and-tradition review in and beyond the Second Amendment. In Bruen and Rahimi, the Roberts Court rejected means-end review in favor of a historical-analogical approach, claiming to constrain the exercise of judicial discretion and thus to promote the dem
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dueling Federalists: Supreme Court Decisions with Multiple Opinions Citing <em>The Federalist</em>, 1986-2007#648425
- The Open and Obvious Doctrine: Putting a "Figment of Judicial Imagination" Back Into Its Rightful Place#262567
- Constitutional History: Past and Present#1265378
- The Classical Constitution and the Historical Constitution: Separated at Birth#345843
- 12 U.S.C. § 2811 — Repealed. Pub. L. 100–242, title V, § 565(b), Feb. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1945#563940
Record · ID 1203164
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive