HAL (France)
open access
Revisiting subclavian access in the ultrasound era: are we comparing sites or techniques? Author’s reply
Background: Central venous catheterization is the most common invasive procedure in intensive care units but remains burdened by infectious, thrombotic, and mechanical complications. Although real-time ultrasound guidance is now widely adopted, its effect on site-specific differences in overall comp
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial#1093296
- Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation#1075364
- Comparison of Axillary Versus Subclavian Vein Strategies for Central Venous Catheterization Under Continuous Ultrasound Guidance#1194927
- Ultrasound Guided Central Vein Catheterization and Complications#865191
- Site-specific complications of central venous catheterization under systematic ultrasound guidance: a target trial emulation revisiting the 3SITES study#1203709
Record · ID 1203498
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive