PsyArXiv
metadata only
Isolating domain-specific and domain-general contributions to global confidence
While metacognition - our ability to evaluate our own cognitive processes - has been extensively studied by measuring trial-by-trial self-assessments of task performance (local confidence), real-world decisions often require a broader perspective, drawing on evaluations of performance over wider tim
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Isolating domain-specific and domain-general contributions to global confidence#1208968
- Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs#1341459
- The Strategic Prompting Scale (SPS) for Measuring Metacognitive Regulation in Human-AI Interaction.#415569
- Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.#465116
- Elaboration Drift: How Human–LLM Interaction Erodes Epistemic Traction#91604
Record · ID 1208905
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive