Zenodo (CERN)
open access
CC BY 4.0
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PEER REVIEW: Editorial Governance, Guidelines, and a Typology of Reviewer Profiles
This study examines the perceptions of 33 scientific peer reviewers in health sciences, representing 12 countries, regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the peer review process. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the research combines descriptive quantitative analysis with qu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Peer Review#1055524
- Public health intelligence for a safer world: WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence strategy...#1305528
- A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare#964379
- How to design digital health interventions with artificial intelligence: A scoping review.#823540
- Governance of artificial intelligence for health systems, WHO European Region.#255304
Record · ID 1209655
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive