arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
What Does Multi-Agent LLM Debate Actually Change? A Layered Analysis of Disagreement and Answer Quality
Multi-agent debate, in which several LLMs exchange arguments before producing an answer, is widely assumed to improve answer quality by surfacing genuine disagreement. That disagreement is hard to verify, and no single signal can settle it, so we organize the analysis around four questions: (A) does
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Collective Regimes in Multi-Agent LLMs under Reasoning Effort and Communication Topology#1130727
- SEPAL: Separated Expert Pairs with Answer-Level Fusion for Reliable LLM Collaboration#1144612
- ECMR: Evidence-Aware Deliberation Control for Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning#1343070
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1357971
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1348837
Record · ID 1210007
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive