arXiv CS
open access
ParanoiaEval: Benchmarking Unnecessary Defensive Work in Agentic Coding
As coding agents increasingly undertake real-world work autonomously, judging whether their risk treatments are warranted has become important. Existing work evaluates related agent behaviors from separate perspectives, but lacks a systematic framework for unifying these behaviors. To bridge this ga
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ParanoiaEval: Benchmarking Unnecessary Defensive Work in Agentic Coding#1218454
- AgentTrails: Towards Trust and Reuse for Agentic Tasks#386977
- Loud Failures, Quiet Failures: Fault Detection and Recovery in Tool-Using Language Model Agents#1234429
- Persona-Execution Separation: An Architecture Pattern for Evolving LLM Agents under Execution Audit#1084343
- Agent READMEs: An Empirical Study of Context Files for Agentic Coding#130762
Record · ID 1210336
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive