Apollo
metadata only
Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversight
Accountability regimes typically encourage record-keeping to enable the transparency that supports oversight, investigation, contestation, and redress. However, implementing such record-keeping can introduce considerations, risks, and consequences, which so far remain under-explored. This paper exam
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AI#163515
- Artificial Intelligence and the Secret Ballot#119214
- AI Meets the GDPR#1177449
- Governing Algorithmic Insurance: Reconciling the EU AI Act with Insurance-Specific Regulation#168844
- Who Governs Data in the AI Era? A Computational Analysis of the U.S. Privacy Workforce in Job Postings#1115986
Record · ID 1210585
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive