ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Hall vs. Conventional Technique in Primary Molars.
This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of the Hall technique (HT) and the conventional technique (CT) for placing Stainless Steel Crowns (SSCs) in primary molars with approximal caries.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assessment of Stainless Stain Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique and Traditional Technique#1294262
- Efficacy of Hall Technique in Atypical Lesions on Primary Teeth#890524
- 3D-printed Ceromer Crowns Versus Stainless Steel in Posterior Primary Molars#1337255
- Cost-efficacy of Sealing Moderate Caries Lesions in Occlusal Surfaces of Primary Molars#1369854
- Custom-Made Zirconia Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin Crowns Versus Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars#1185699
Record · ID 1212296
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive