ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone
Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by : 1. clinical and Radiographic analysis . 2. Histomorphometric analysis .
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Peri-implant Soft Tissue Response to Direct Zirconia-Based Composite Customized Healing Abutment#1173570
- Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Using a Bone Substitute With or Without a Resorbable Collagen Membrane#1197890
- Horizontal Bone Augmentation of Alveolar Ridge#831857
- The Effect of Simvastatin With Guided Bone Regeneration in Ridge Splitting and Simultaneously Implantation#904938
- L-PRF Versus Sticky Bone Grafting of the Jumping Gap in AI-assisted Computer-Guided Socket Shield Immediate Implantation#1114972
Record · ID 1212428
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive