ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of TEP and eTEP Methods in Inguinal Hernia Repair
The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique provides a wider operative field than the conventional totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique and may facilitate dissection, instrument manipulation, and mesh placement. This study evaluates the potential advantages of eTEP compared with TEP in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP#868099
- Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair#979755
- Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?#1337071
- Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair#867377
- SIngle Port vs Standard TEP for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair#1246901
Record · ID 1212657
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive