ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Comparison Between M-E-BCS and C-O-BCS.
This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The study aims to evaluate differences in operative efficiency (e.g., operative time), economic effect, surgical safety (e.g., surgical complication rates), postoperative aesthetics (e.g., BREAST-Q scores, Harris scores, SCAR-Q scores and Ueda scores), and oncological safety (e.g., margin status, no local recurrence survival) between patients undergoing M-E-BCS and patients undergoing C-O-BCS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is an Online-tool Capable of Improving Patients' Outcomes After Surgery?#1185806
- Volatile Anaesthesia and Perioperative Outcomes Related to Cancer: the VAPOR-C Trial#1338273
- Effect of Acupressure Applied Before Cystectomy on Preoperative Anxiety Level#1010932
- FOcUs on Colorectal CAncer oUtcomes: Long-Term Study#1137208
- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PAIN ANXIETY AND POST-OPERATIVE PAIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHOLECYSTECTOMY SURGERY#884279
Record · ID 1213090
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive