ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
This study wishes to compare patient satisfaction and cosmesis of two different closure methods of laparoscopic ports. One method uses tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with a deep sub-cutaneous stitch and a Band-Aid dressing. The comparison method uses a 3.o undyed vicryl transcutaneous stitch, with a Bacitracin and Tegaderm dressing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prospective Evaluation of the Use of Thunderbeat Vessel Sealing Device in Laparoscopic Surgery#803120
- Usability and Performance Evaluation of the AutoLap System - a Feasibility Study#851918
- Efficiency of Different Modes of Universal Adhesive#1071977
- Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Using EndoClear-Endoscopic Lens Cleaning Device#1292516
- Hysteroscopic "Hot Knife" and "Cold Knife" in the Treatment of the Intrauterine Adhesion#1086813
Record · ID 1213822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive