ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing a Fully-Coated Cementless Stem Versus a Cemented Stem for Total Hip Replacements
The purpose of this study is to answer the question as to whether or not a fully coated cementless stem is equal to or better than a cemented stem in patients over 72 years with good bone quality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Uncemented Fully Coated Stem With Patients of 85 Years and More, Complications and Risks Factor#1186056
- The Viability of Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty#1008831
- The Paradox of the Decline of Cemented Femoral Stems#26185
- Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation of Hip Short Stem Performed by Anterior Approach#1125601
- Osseointegration of Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Stems in Femoral Neck Fractures Over 80 Years#1310488
Record · ID 1214038
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive