ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
TIPS Versus Portacaval Shunt for Acute Bleeding Varices in Cirrhosis
In unselected cirrhotic patients with acute portal hypertension-related bleeding to compare the effectiveness in control of bleeding, mortality rate, duration of life, quality of life, and economic costs of two widely used treatment measures: (1) emergency transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt (TIPS), and (2) emergency portacaval shunt.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Band Ligation Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent Shunt (TIPS) in Cirrhotics With Recurrent Variceal Bleeding Non Responding to Medical Therapy#875106
- Comparative Efficacy of Various Non-invasive Methods in Assessing Response to Beta-blockers as Secondary Prophylaxis for Acute Variceal Bleed.#1140617
- Carvedilol for Pre-primary Prophylaxis of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis#892775
- Rotational Thromboelastometry [ROTEM] vs Thromboelastography [TEG] Guided Blood Component Use in Patients With Cirrhosis of Liver With Non-variceal Bleeding.#1114985
- Improve the Strategies of Endoscopic and Interventional Treatment of Gastroesophageal Hemorrhage in Portal Hypertension#844588
Record · ID 1214396
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive