arXiv (All)
open access
Before Agent Tells The Lie: Has Deception Already Been Represented?
Large language model (LLM)-based agents can exhibit deceptive behavior during task execution, including hiding failures, fabricating results, or falsely signaling task completion. Existing monitoring approaches mainly detect deception after it appears in observable actions or outputs. In this paper,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DecepEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deception in LLM Agents#1217702
- From Deceptive Outputs to Deceptive Mechanisms: A Causal Framework for Language-Model Deception Research#639707
- PRISM: Recovering Instruction Sets from Language Model Activations#1117460
- FIRE: Failure-Informed Runtime Engineering for Reliable Language-Model Agents#1061953
- FIRE: Failure-Informed Runtime Engineering for Reliable Language-Model Agents#1043151
Record · ID 1215674
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive