arXiv (All)
open access
Language models can notice an impossible engineering problem yet still report it as solved
Language models draft engineering calculations, but answer accuracy does not show whether they reject an impossible problem. We tested 14 models on 30 pairs of mechanics problems, each with a valid version and one made impossible by changing a given value or assumption. Two independent solvers verif
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Language models can notice an impossible engineering problem yet still report it as solved#1194473
- SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models#429402
- Why Didn't It Check? Unsupported Final Claims and Their Repair in Two Tool-Equipped Language Models#781061
- Why Didn't It Check? Unsupported Final Claims and Their Repair in Two Tool-Equipped Language Models#779686
- Beyond the Answer Key: Robustness Evaluation of Large Language Models for Step-Level Mathematical Verification#792971
Record · ID 1215760
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive