arXiv (All)
open access
Scale or speed? When do path signatures improve volatility-regime forecasts?
We study when path signatures, increasingly used as model-free features of return paths, improve out-of-sample forecasts of volatility regimes. In daily United States and developed-market equity returns from 2005 to 2025, machine-learning classifiers do not beat a heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Machine Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Models, Benchmarks, and Challenges – A Case Study#384735
- A comparison of Statistical and Neural Network models in volatility modeling#284096
- WaVeFuse: Regime-Adaptive Equity Index Forecasting via Channel-Wise Wavelet Denoising and Vertical Attention Fusion#1084659
- Estimating conditional volatility with neural networks#1194090
- Forecast Accuracy Is Not Trading Profit: Evolving Small Recurrent Networks for Stock Return Prediction#1217200
Record · ID 1215780
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive