arXiv (All)
open access
Do Neural PDE Solvers Learn the Right Dynamics?
Neural PDE solvers can achieve low prediction errors, but do they reproduce the dynamics of the systems they model? Prediction scores alone offer an incomplete answer: they measure agreement with reference solutions but provide limited insight into how errors accumulate, nearby states diverge, or ex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Predicting Change, Not States: An Alternate Framework for Neural PDE Surrogates#1233672
- Cost-Accuracy Trade-offs: Neural Operator vs Classical Numerical Solver#1050208
- Physics is the Best Teacher: Consistency Learning for Time-Invariant Operators of Chaotic Dynamics#1199382
- Test-Time Forecasting: Recurrent Depth Enables In-Context Dynamics Prediction#1354244
- Latent-MoE: Domain-Aware Mixture-of-Experts for PDEs with Multi-Regime Physics#984708
Record · ID 1216034
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive