arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying the Gap between Understanding and Generation within Unified Multimodal Models
Recent advances in unified multimodal models (UMM) have demonstrated remarkable progress in both understanding and generation tasks. However, whether these two capabilities are genuinely aligned and integrated within a single model remains unclear. To investigate this question, we introduce GapEval,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Visual Abstention in Unified Multimodal Models#1217622
- What Comes Next? Omni-StoryBench for Evaluating Story-Grounded Omnimodal Generation#1141360
- EmAvatar: Multimodal Empathetic Response Generation via Conflict Resolution and Expressive Guidance#1142784
- Pattern-Calibrated Multimodal Prediction under Blockwise Missingness#924606
- Pattern-Calibrated Multimodal Prediction under Blockwise Missingness#920374
Record · ID 1216234
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive