arXiv (All)
open access
Verified, not generated: expert-verified AI study materials and the distribution of learning gains in a university course
Experimental studies of generative AI in education mostly report average effects, yet field evidence shows that AI can narrow attainment gaps or widen them. We argue that the direction depends on the judgement burden, the expertise a learner must supply to screen AI output before learning from it, a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Impact of Generative AI on Knowledge Work and Student Learning: A Systematic Literature Review#235382
- Has Scientific Talent Shifted from Depth to Breadth?Evidence across Papers, Knowledge Inputs, Careers, and Teams#1083860
- Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Materials#964422
- Artificial Intelligence in Education : 27th International Conference, AIED 2026, Seoul, South Korea, June 27–July 3, 2026, Proceedings, Part IV / edited by Emmanuel G. Blanchard, Guanliang Chen, Min Chi, Seiji Isotani#628847
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1036459
Record · ID 1216472
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive