arXiv (All)
open access
Large scientific teams are more, not less, disruptive
Modern science has moved decisively toward larger and more collaborative research teams. Yet an influential 2019 study reported that small teams are more disruptive than large teams, a conclusion difficult to reconcile with both the well-known trend toward increasing collaboration and the disproport
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DP18833: Dynamic Investment and Coordination in Teams: Theory and Experimental Evidence#395561
- Assessing Interdisciplinary Impact: Insights from the Sentinel North Research Strategy at Université Laval, Canada#480232
- Small worlds and clustering in spatial networks#799793
- Navigating Complexity: Enhancing Communication Quality at the Science-Policy Interface#217522
- Below the Surface: Creep, Corrosion, and Tipping Points in the Social Resilience of Science#1037546
Record · ID 1216704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive