arXiv (All)
open access
Citations Are Late: Reading epistemic instability from what papers believe, years before the citation graph catches up
Paradigm shifts in science are visible in what researchers assert and contest before they are visible in the citation graph. We ask whether a cheap, content-level signal of epistemic instability, derived from the changing distribution of stated modelling beliefs in paper abstracts, can anticipate a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Coherence, Justification, and the AGM Theory of Belief Revision#767249
- When Is Scientific Dissent Epistemically Inappropriate?#114007
- The Validity of the Argument from Inductive Risk#94544
- The Death of the Gatekeeper AI as an Epistemic Substrate for Constraint-Based Legitimacy#89143
- The Impact of Impermanent Web-Located Citations: A Study of Scholarly Conference Publications#1026259
Record · ID 1216772
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive