arXiv (All)
open access
Fork-and-Flush: Escaping Idea Basins in Autoresearch Agents
Autoresearch agents tackle open-ended problems by repeatedly proposing candidate solutions, evaluating them, and using feedback to guide subsequent experiments. We show that independent runs of the same agent on the same task often plateau at substantially different scores, with gaps that persist ev
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DualStake: Dual-Path Confidence Calibration in Deep Research Agents#820932
- AutoTuneBench: Trustworthy Measurement for Agent Auto-Tuning of LLM Serving Engines#1011819
- Explore Before Committing: Hypothesis-Guided Search for Deep Research Agents#821246
- Beyond Confidence: Test-Time Scaling for Multi-Turn Search Agents via Retrieval Grounding#684615
- Beyond Confidence: Test-Time Scaling for Multi-Turn Search Agents via Retrieval Grounding#682837
Record · ID 1216822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive