arXiv (All)
open access
COMPASS: Finding Where Reasoning Lives in Language Models
Explicitly eliciting reasoning substantially improves LLM performance. Existing approaches require a predefined characterization of reasoning, whether through CoT prompt design, contrastive CoT directions, or via SAE derived reasoning features. For mathematical reasoning with verifiable answers, we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#799472
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#798049
- Planning with Transformers: Chain of Computation and Structured Context Windows#1296456
- Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models#160912
- GUT: Quantifying and Optimizing the Reasoning Uncertainty of LLMs via Graph Complexity#972220
Record · ID 1216844
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive