arXiv (All)
open access
Language-model ratings of depression reflect the rater more than the patient
Depression has no diagnostic blood test. Language models promise tireless, consistent assessment, but can accurate raters disagree about individuals? We pre-registered 880 language-model raters, crossing 11 open models with prompting and scoring choices, and applied them to 189 interviews against th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Scalable, context-sensitive psychiatric assessment with large language models and brief diaries#223244
- Validating objective and scalable speech markers of depression across two independent psychiatric cohorts / Felix Menne, Felix Dörr, Johannes Tröger, Alexandra König, Julia Schräder, Diana Immel, René Hurlemann, Simon Barton, Lisa Wagels#628936
- Accurate ratios for the calculation of Speech and Language Therapy staffing for health institutions: a systematic review#372407
- The Role of Voice Acoustics in Depression Assessment: Findings From Bibliometric Analysis, Literature Review, and Meta-Analysis.#138398
- Does Reasoning Improve Psychological Depth in Large Language Models? It Depends on Who's Judging#1083274
Record · ID 1218236
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive